State ex rel. Waterhouse v. Summit Cty. Common Pleas Court
This text of 2023 Ohio 1878 (State ex rel. Waterhouse v. Summit Cty. Common Pleas Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Waterhouse v. Summit Cty. Common Pleas Court, 2023-Ohio-1878.]
STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )
STATE EX REL. RICHARD L. WATERHOUSE
Petitioner C.A. No. 30565
v.
SUMMIT COUNTY COMMON PLEAS ORIGINAL ACTION IN COURT HABEAS CORPUS
Respondent
Dated: June 7, 2023
PER CURIAM.
{¶1} Richard Waterhouse petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his
release from custody. Respondent moved to dismiss. Because Mr. Waterhouse has been released
from custody, the claim is moot and this Court dismisses the petition.
{¶2} When Mr. Waterhouse filed this action, he was incarcerated in the Summit County
Jail. After this action, and the motion to dismiss, were filed, Mr. Waterhouse resolved his criminal
cases. This Court may consider evidence outside the petition to determine that an action is moot.
State ex rel. Nelson v. Russo, 89 Ohio St.3d 227, 228 (2000).
{¶3} According to the docket for his criminal cases, he entered pleas, was sentenced, and
was released from custody. When a petitioner has been released from incarceration, the prisoner’s
habeas corpus claim is moot. State ex rel. Johnson v. Foley, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3634,
¶ 4. C.A. No. 30565 Page 2 of 2
{¶4} Because Mr. Waterhouse has been released from custody, his petition is moot. This
case is dismissed. Costs are taxed to Mr. Waterhouse.
{¶5} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice
of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58.
JENNIFER L. HENSAL FOR THE COURT
CARR, J. STEVENSON, J. CONCUR.
APPEARANCES:
RICHARD L. WATERHOUSE, Pro Se, Petitioner.
SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and JACQUENETTE S. CORGAN, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ohio 1878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-waterhouse-v-summit-cty-common-pleas-court-ohioctapp-2023.