State ex rel. Washington v. State

802 So. 2d 638, 2001 La. LEXIS 3333, 2001 WL 1660890
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 7, 2001·No. No. 2000-KH-2741·Published

Opinion

In re Washington, Eugene; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 99-797; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 00-KH-1407.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will determine whether relator’s attorney failed to discover that one of relator’s predicate convictions had cleansed under R.S. 14:98(F)(2), and if so whether that failure caused counsel to render ineffective assistance under the test set out in Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58, 106 S.Ct. 366, 370, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985) and State v. Washington, 491 So.2d 1337, 1339 (La.1986). In all other respects, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Washington v. State, 802 So. 2d 638, 2001 La. LEXIS 3333, 2001 WL 1660890 (La. 2001).

802 So. 2d 638 (State ex rel. Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Washington
491 So. 2d 1337 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986)