State ex rel. Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Ross
87 P. 1151, 44 Wash. 698, 1906 Wash. LEXIS 907
Opinion
The record in this case shows that every material proposition involved was decided adversely to appellant’s contention, by this court, in the case of State v. Washington Dredging etc. Co., 43 Wash. 508, 86 Pac. 936. An elaborate and able petition for rehearing was filed in that case, which, after due consideration, was denied. Being satisfied with the decision in that case, the judgment in this case will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Ross, 87 P. 1151, 44 Wash. 698, 1906 Wash. LEXIS 907 (Wash. 1906).
87 P. 1151 (State ex rel. Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. State
101 P. 884 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)