State ex rel. Warren v. State
This text of 18 So. 3d 111 (State ex rel. Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Warren, Lee Roy;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial [112]*112Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 02-F0432; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 44,-026-KH.
Writ granted in part; case remanded. The appellate court order denying writs fails to demonstrate compliance with La. Const, art. V Section 8(B). Petitioner’s application is therefore remanded to the Second Circuit Court of Appeal for consideration by a randomly selected panel of which a majority concurs in rendering judgment. Cf. State v. Cordero, 08-1717 (La.10/3/08), 993 So.2d 203.
WEIMER, J., concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons assigned in State v. Cordero, 08-1717 (La.10/03/08), 993 So.2d 203.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 So. 3d 111, 2009 La. LEXIS 2791, 2009 WL 3271145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-warren-v-state-la-2009.