State ex rel. Warner & Swasey Co. v. Industrial Commission

363 N.E.2d 736, 50 Ohio St. 2d 152, 4 Ohio Op. 3d 346, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 392
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 1977·No. No. 76-1363·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The specific orders which the relator is attacking have been vacated. Moreover, by adoption of the above cited amendments to claims procedures before it, the commission has substantially widened the scope of discovery available to an employer.

Because of these actions by the commission, the issues raised by the relator are moot, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown., Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Warner & Swasey Co. v. Industrial Commission, 363 N.E.2d 736, 50 Ohio St. 2d 152, 4 Ohio Op. 3d 346, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 392 (Ohio 1977).

363 N.E.2d 736 (State ex rel. Warner & Swasey Co. v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Adkins v. Dinovo
2015 Ohio 473 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)
State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman
450 N.E.2d 1163 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)