State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Products

855 N.E.2d 1202, 111 Ohio St. 3d 261
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 2006·No. No. 2005-2116·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Products, 855 N.E.2d 1202, 111 Ohio St. 3d 261 (Ohio 2006).

855 N.E.2d 1202 (State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Products) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.