State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Products

855 N.E.2d 1202, 111 Ohio St. 3d 261
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 2006
DocketNo. 2005-2116
StatusPublished

This text of 855 N.E.2d 1202 (State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Products) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Products, 855 N.E.2d 1202, 111 Ohio St. 3d 261 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
855 N.E.2d 1202, 111 Ohio St. 3d 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ward-v-dorman-products-ohio-2006.