State ex rel. Wallace v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Wallace v. State

620 So. 2d 885, 1993 La. LEXIS 2305, 1993 WL 264985

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Wallace v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 La. LEXIS 849 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 2, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-1690·Published

Opinion

In re Wallace, Lionel; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW93 1690; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 1-80-439.

[886]*886The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed over sixty days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wallace, Lionel; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW93 1690; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 1-80-439.

[886]*886The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed over sixty days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

State ex rel. Wallace v. State, 620 So. 2d 885, 1993 La. LEXIS 2305, 1993 WL 264985 (La. 1993).

Pincite

620 So. 2d 885 (State ex rel. Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.