State ex rel. Wall v. Grossman

398 N.E.2d 789, 61 Ohio St. 2d 4, 15 Ohio Op. 3d 2, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 600
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 2, 1980
DocketNo. 79-1101
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 398 N.E.2d 789 (State ex rel. Wall v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Wall v. Grossman, 398 N.E.2d 789, 61 Ohio St. 2d 4, 15 Ohio Op. 3d 2, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 600 (Ohio 1980).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The conditions which must exist to support the issuance of a writ of prohibition are: “(1) The court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law; and (3) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which [5]*5there is no other adequate remedy.” State, ex rel. Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11.

Here, as in State, ex rel. Adler, v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 1, decided this day, there is no question of the jurisdiction of the court to hear the pending case. The Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Juvenile Division, has jurisdiction to proceed to disposition of a case charging a violation of R. C. 2151.41.

Further, appellant’s allegations do not support any unauthorized usurpation of judicial power nor do they show that appeal is not an adequate remedy at law herein. See Adler, supra, and cases cited therein.

For reasons of the foregoing, the judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the complaint in prohibition is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Anderson
2012 Ohio 4390 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
McAuley v. Smith
729 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999)
State Ex Rel. J. Richard Gaier Co. v. Kessler
647 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
State Ex Rel. Electrolert, Inc. v. Lindeman
650 N.E.2d 137 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
Ohio Mall Contractors, Inc. v. Dickinson
585 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
State ex rel. Hardesty v. Williamson
459 N.E.2d 552 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)
State ex rel. Smith v. Court of Common Pleas
436 N.E.2d 1005 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1982)
State ex rel. Henry v. Britt
424 N.E.2d 297 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1981)
DuBose v. Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull County
413 N.E.2d 1205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
State ex rel. Kynard v. Court of Common Pleas
405 N.E.2d 719 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
State ex rel. Parker v. Court of Common Pleas
402 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
State v. Thomas
400 N.E.2d 897 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 N.E.2d 789, 61 Ohio St. 2d 4, 15 Ohio Op. 3d 2, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wall-v-grossman-ohio-1980.