State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm.

10 N.E.3d 736, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1415

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 11, 2014

Docket2013-1203

StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.E.3d 736 (State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm., 10 N.E.3d 736, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinions

In Mandamus. Upon consideration of the respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and the amended motion for leave to intervene and for judgment on the pleadings of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, it is ordered by the court that the amended motion for leave to intervene and the amended motion for judgment on the pleadings are denied, and respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. Upon consideration of the respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and the amended motion for leave to intervene and for judgment on the pleadings of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, it is ordered by the court that the amended motion for leave to intervene and the amended motion for judgment on the pleadings are denied, and respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 N.E.3d 736, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-w-mkt-plaza-ltd-partnership-v-summit-cty-planning-comm-ohio-2014.