State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm.

10 N.E.3d 736, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1415

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 11, 2014·No. 2013-1203·Published

Opinions

In Mandamus. Upon consideration of the respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and the amended motion for leave to intervene and for judgment on the pleadings of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, it is ordered by the court that the amended motion for leave to intervene and the amended motion for judgment on the pleadings are denied, and respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. Upon consideration of the respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and the amended motion for leave to intervene and for judgment on the pleadings of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, it is ordered by the court that the amended motion for leave to intervene and the amended motion for judgment on the pleadings are denied, and respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm., 10 N.E.3d 736, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

10 N.E.3d 736 (State ex rel. W. Mkt. Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. Summit Cty. Planning Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.