State ex rel. Vrable II, Inc. v. Court of Appeals
934 N.E.2d 358, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1588
This text of 934 N.E.2d 358 (State ex rel. Vrable II, Inc. v. Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Vrable II, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 934 N.E.2d 358, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1588 (Ohio 2010).
Opinion
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s amended motion to expedite,
It is ordered by the court that the amended motion to expedite is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
934 N.E.2d 358, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-vrable-ii-inc-v-court-of-appeals-ohio-2010.