State ex rel. Vrable II, Inc. v. Court of Appeals

934 N.E.2d 358, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1588
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 29, 2010·No. 2010-1664·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s amended motion to expedite,

It is ordered by the court that the amended motion to expedite is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Vrable II, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 934 N.E.2d 358, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1588 (Ohio 2010).

934 N.E.2d 358 (State ex rel. Vrable II, Inc. v. Court of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.