State ex rel. Vitoratos v. Whiddon
209 N.E.2d 171, 3 Ohio St. 2d 52, 32 Ohio Op. 2d 28, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 444
Opinion
If, as relator contends, respondent has property belonging to relator, relator may recover such property in an action of replevin. In the exercise of its discretion, this court will ordinarily refuse a writ of mandamus where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St. 302.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Vitoratos v. Whiddon, 209 N.E.2d 171, 3 Ohio St. 2d 52, 32 Ohio Op. 2d 28, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 444 (Ohio 1965).
209 N.E.2d 171 (State ex rel. Vitoratos v. Whiddon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Luke v. Corrigan
399 N.E.2d 1208 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
State ex rel. Williams v. City of Canton
364 N.E.2d 1161 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1977)