State ex rel. Virostek v. Liberty Twp. Bd. of Trustees

93 Ohio St. 3d 1259
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 26, 2001
Docket01-1028
StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1259 (State ex rel. Virostek v. Liberty Twp. Bd. of Trustees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Virostek v. Liberty Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1259 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

In Quo Warranto. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination and consideration of respondent board’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment dismissing the petition, and relator’s motion to strike,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relator’s motion be, and hereby is, DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent board’s motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, GRANTED and that the cause be, and hereby is, DISMISSED.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents, would grant an alternative writ, and would deny ah other motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 Ohio St. 3d 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-virostek-v-liberty-twp-bd-of-trustees-ohio-2001.