State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. Bashko

148 N.W. 1082, 127 Minn. 519, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 933
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 9, 1914
DocketNos. 18,827-(295)
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 148 N.W. 1082 (State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. Bashko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. Bashko, 148 N.W. 1082, 127 Minn. 519, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 933 (Mich. 1914).

Opinion

Pee Ctjbiam.

The attorneys have stipulated that this case shall he deemed to be before this court as upon a writ of certiorari, but no such writ was ever applied for or issued. They seek to review the findings of the district court in this manner, although no judgment has been entered in that court. Even if such findings could be reviewed by writ of certiorari, and if the parties could substitute a stipulation in place of the writ, neither of which can be conceded, the time within which such findings could be so reviewed had expired before the making of the present stipulation.

This court has never acquired jurisdiction of the ease and the proceedings in this court are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin
115 N.W.2d 235 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1962)
Gartner v. Hogstad Fish Co.
38 N.W.2d 844 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1949)
Neumann v. Edwards
178 N.W. 589 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 N.W. 1082, 127 Minn. 519, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-virginia-rainy-lake-co-v-bashko-minn-1914.