State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Wolff

944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 6, 2011
Docket2011-0132
StatusPublished

This text of 944 N.E.2d 693 (State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Wolff, 944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. Motion for leave to intervene granted. Motions for admission pro hac vice of Martin G. Weinberg and J. Alan Johnson granted. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry, relators shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence, respondent and intervening respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relators’ brief, and relators may file a reply brief within seven days after filing of respondent’s and intervening respondents’ brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-vindicator-printing-co-v-wolff-ohio-2011.