State ex rel. Vickers v. 21st Judicial District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Vickers v. 21st Judicial District Court

263 So. 2d 724, 262 La. 459, 1972 La. LEXIS 4899

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 29, 1972

DocketNo. 52579

StatusPublished

This text of 263 So. 2d 724 (State ex rel. Vickers v. 21st Judicial District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Vickers v. 21st Judicial District Court, 263 So. 2d 724, 262 La. 459, 1972 La. LEXIS 4899 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

BARHAM, J., concurs.

Applicant only asks for mandamus and does not attach a copy of his writ for habeas corpus. I agree the mandamus is moot and the application before us gives us nothing to consider which could give relator further relief. However, the petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed, according to the Court, Nov. 7, 1971 — 8 months ago — and only now has it been denied. This is inexcusable delay and should be severely condemned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARHAM, J., concurs.

Applicant only asks for mandamus and does not attach a copy of his writ for habeas corpus. I agree the mandamus is moot and the application before us gives us nothing to consider which could give relator further relief. However, the petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed, according to the Court, Nov. 7, 1971 — 8 months ago — and only now has it been denied. This is inexcusable delay and should be severely condemned.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 So. 2d 724, 262 La. 459, 1972 La. LEXIS 4899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-vickers-v-21st-judicial-district-court-la-1972.