State ex rel. Verizon Wireless v. Villanueva

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Verizon Wireless v. Villanueva

846 N.E.2d 531, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1420

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 2006·No. 2006-0407·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. On respondent’s motion to dismiss and motions for leave to intervene and to dismiss of Cindy Satterfield, Highland Speech Service, Inc., and Intermessage Communications. Motion for leave to intervene granted. Motions to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., would deny the motions to dismiss and grant an alternative writ. Resnick and O’Donnell, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. On respondent’s motion to dismiss and motions for leave to intervene and to dismiss of Cindy Satterfield, Highland Speech Service, Inc., and Intermessage Communications. Motion for leave to intervene granted. Motions to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., would deny the motions to dismiss and grant an alternative writ. Resnick and O’Donnell, JJ., not participating.

State ex rel. Verizon Wireless v. Villanueva, 846 N.E.2d 531, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1420 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

846 N.E.2d 531 (State ex rel. Verizon Wireless v. Villanueva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.