State ex rel. Veith v. Capdevielle
74 So. 110, 140 La. 811, 1917 La. LEXIS 1440
Opinion
Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the domicile of the surety on the appeal bond is not “in the jurisdiction of the court” which rendered the judgment. If such be the fact, the appeal will have to be dismissed. Act 67, p. 109, of 1876. For taking evidence on that point the case is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Veith v. Capdevielle, 74 So. 110, 140 La. 811, 1917 La. LEXIS 1440 (La. 1917).
74 So. 110 (State ex rel. Veith v. Capdevielle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hartman-Salmen Co. v. Maloney
156 So. 83 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Stewart v. Clay
117 So. 147 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. Martel
3 La. App. 639 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1926)
Carrano v. Concordia Fire Insurance
2 Pelt. 323 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)