State ex rel. Vasquez v. Zemmelman

580 N.E.2d 1098, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1469, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2801
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 27, 1991·No. 91-2022·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Vasquez v. Zemmelman, 580 N.E.2d 1098, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1469, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2801 (Ohio 1991).

580 N.E.2d 1098 (State ex rel. Vasquez v. Zemmelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leo G. Keffalas, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.
583 N.E.2d 969 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Pusey
583 N.E.2d 969 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
State ex rel. Vasquez v. Zemmelman
583 N.E.2d 969 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)