State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals

23 N.E.3d 1191, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1448

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 2015

Docket2014-1605

StatusPublished

This text of 23 N.E.3d 1191 (State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals, 23 N.E.3d 1191, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1448 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion for issuance of peremptory or alternative writ. It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

On motion to dismiss. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would issue a peremptory writ. O’Donnell, J., would dismiss the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion for issuance of peremptory or alternative writ. It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

On motion to dismiss. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would issue a peremptory writ. O’Donnell, J., would dismiss the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 N.E.3d 1191, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-varnau-v-twelfth-dist-court-of-appeals-ohio-2015.