State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals

23 N.E.3d 1191, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1448
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 2015·No. 2014-1605·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion for issuance of peremptory or alternative writ. It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

On motion to dismiss. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would issue a peremptory writ. O’Donnell, J., would dismiss the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals, 23 N.E.3d 1191, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1448 (Ohio 2015).

23 N.E.3d 1191 (State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.