State ex rel. Varholick v. Donnelly
This text of 2014 Ohio 2655 (State ex rel. Varholick v. Donnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Varholick v. Donnelly, 2014-Ohio-2655.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101241
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JAMES VARHOLICK RELATOR
vs.
MICHAEL P. DONNELLY, JUDGE RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 475359 Order No. 475709
RELEASE DATE: June 16, 2014 RELATOR
James Varholick, pro se No. 5730485 Marion Correctional Institution P.O. Box 57 Marion, Ohio 43301
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 9th Floor, Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.:
{¶1} James Varholick has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo. Varholick
seeks an order from this court, that requires Judge Michael P. Donnelly to render a ruling
with regard to a motion captioned “motion to return one 2002 Ford F-150 King Ranch
truck forfeited in violation of O.R.C. 2933.43 & O.R.C. 4511.19 on February 23, 2007”,
which was filed in State v. Varholick, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-06-485615-A.
{¶2} Attached to Judge Donnelly’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of a
judgment entry, journalized on May 20, 2014, which demonstrates that a ruling has been
rendered with regard to Varholick’s motion to return forfeited property. Thus, the
complaint for a writ of procedendo is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex
rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).
{¶3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Donnelly’s motion for summary judgment.
Costs to Judge Donnelly. Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all
parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by
Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶4} Writ denied.
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, JUDGE
KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J., and EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 2655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-varholick-v-donnelly-ohioctapp-2014.