State Ex Rel. Vandrei v. Common Pleas, Unpublished Decision (11-17-2004)
Opinion
{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which is a copy of a journal entry issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on August 9, 2004 in which respondent granted relator 281 days jail-time credit. Relator has not opposed the motion. Respondent argues that the court of common pleas has discharged its duty to dispose of the motion for jail-time credit. We agree.
{¶ 3} The complaint also manifests various defects.
{¶ 4} "[Relator] has failed to comply with the mandatoryrequirements of R.C.
{¶ 5} People ex. rel. King v. Boyko, Cuyahoga App. No. 84927,
{¶ 6} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
Celebrezze, JR. P.J., Concur.
Rocco, J., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2004 Ohio 6092 (State Ex Rel. Vandrei v. Common Pleas, Unpublished Decision (11-17-2004)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.