State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby
This text of 185 N.E. 59 (State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter coming on to be heard upon the application of the relator for a writ of ouster, was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon consideration whereof, said application is denied, for the rea *210 son that under the record the evidence shows that Vandenbark had removed from the district, within the meaning of Section 4748, General Code, and the probate court, by virtue of Section 7610-1, General Code, had lawful right to fill such vacancy, as he did.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 N.E. 59, 126 Ohio St. 209, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 209, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-vandenbark-v-whartenby-ohio-1933.