State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby

185 N.E. 59, 126 Ohio St. 209, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 209, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 439
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 1933
Docket23793
StatusPublished

This text of 185 N.E. 59 (State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby, 185 N.E. 59, 126 Ohio St. 209, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 209, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 439 (Ohio 1933).

Opinion

This matter coming on to be heard upon the application of the relator for a writ of ouster, was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon consideration whereof, said application is denied, for the rea *210 son that under the record the evidence shows that Vandenbark had removed from the district, within the meaning of Section 4748, General Code, and the probate court, by virtue of Section 7610-1, General Code, had lawful right to fill such vacancy, as he did.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Allen and Kinkade, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 N.E. 59, 126 Ohio St. 209, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 209, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-vandenbark-v-whartenby-ohio-1933.