State ex rel. Van Horn v. Shaw

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Van Horn v. Shaw

682 N.E.2d 1002, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2221

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 11, 1997

Docket97-1469

StatusPublished

This text of 682 N.E.2d 1002 (State ex rel. Van Horn v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Van Horn v. Shaw, 682 N.E.2d 1002, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2221 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relators’ amended complaint and motion to expedite,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, sita sponte, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion to expedite and grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relators’ amended complaint and motion to expedite,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, sita sponte, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion to expedite and grant an alternative writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 N.E.2d 1002, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-van-horn-v-shaw-ohio-1997.