State Ex Rel. Van Brocklyn v. Savidge

249 P. 996, 140 Wash. 361, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 733
Washington Supreme Court·Decided September 21, 1926·No. No. 20078. En Banc.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*362 Main, J.

— This is an original application in this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the state land commissioner to issue the relator a lease for the extraction of petroleum and natural gas from state lands. In State ex rel. Goodwin v. Savidge, 133 Wash. 532, 234 Pac. 1, an application exactly like this was denied. It was there said:

“The Attorney General, appearing upon behalf of respondent, has demurred upon the ground that the application should have been filed in the superior court in the first instance, relying upon State ex rel. Ottesen v. Clausen, 124 Wash. 389, 214 Pac. 635. We think this contention should be sustained. This court has heretofore taken jurisdiction of many cases of this character, but such jurisdiction is not exclusive, and it seems to be the better practice that such cases should first be presented to the superior court, and if the parties are not satisfied with the decision, then appeal may be had to this court.”

That case does not differ from this in any respect, except that the parties there were different and the land was not the same. The question in the two cases is the same.

. The writ will be denied.

Tot,man, C. J., Mitchell, Holcomb, Askren, Parker, and Bridges, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Van Brocklyn v. Savidge, 249 P. 996, 140 Wash. 361, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 733 (Wash. 1926).

249 P. 996 (State Ex Rel. Van Brocklyn v. Savidge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Malmo v. Case
169 P.2d 623 (Washington Supreme Court, 1946)
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Lawler
98 P.2d 658 (Washington Supreme Court, 1940)
State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. State Board of Equalization
249 P. 996 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)