State Ex Rel. v. Williams, Judge

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. v. Williams, Judge

191 So. 81, 139 Fla. 838

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 28, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.'

This case is before us on motion for peremptory writ.

The question presented involves the questions which were presented and determined in the case of Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rotter, filed at this term of the Court and not yet reported.

On authority of the opinion and judgment in that case, the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued is quashed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Bufor» and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.'

This case is before us on motion for peremptory writ.

The question presented involves the questions which were presented and determined in the case of Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rotter, filed at this term of the Court and not yet reported.

On authority of the opinion and judgment in that case, the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued is quashed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Bufor» and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

State Ex Rel. v. Williams, Judge, 191 So. 81, 139 Fla. 838 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

191 So. 81 (State Ex Rel. v. Williams, Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.