State, Ex Rel. v. Rosental

148 So. 769, 109 Fla. 363
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 769 (State, Ex Rel. v. Rosental) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, Ex Rel. v. Rosental, 148 So. 769, 109 Fla. 363 (Fla. 1933).

Opinions

The Attorney General of the State brought quo warranto proceedings to test the validity of the franchise claimed herein by the respondent.

A franchise is a special privilege conferred upon one or more individuals or a corporation by governmental authority to do something that cannot be done of common right. Leonard et al. v. Baylan Street Wharf Co., 59 Fla., 547, 52 So.2d 718, 31 L.R.A. (N.S.) 636; 26 C. J. 1008.

The right to establish and maintain a toll bridge is a franchise. A grant from a sovereign power is essential to the creation of a franchise. Subject to organic limitations, the Legislature may grant franchises. 26 C. J. 1013, 1025. If the legislative power to grant franchises may be delegated when the franchise directly affects the rights and prerogatives *Page 365 of the State, such delegation of authority should be accompanied by appropriate limitations within which the delegated authority may be exercised, in order to enforce controlling law and to conserve public policy and the general welfare.

The navigable waters within the State and the lands thereunder are held by the State in trust for all the people of the State, subject to the powers of Congress as to navigation. State ex rel. Ellis v. Gerbing, 56 Fla. 503, 47 So.2d 353, 22 L.R.A. (N.S.) 337.

Chapter 11640, Acts of 1925, under a title "to confer power and authority on the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, to grant licenses, privileges and franchises to any persons or corporation, under such conditions and for such a term as the Board of County Commissioners may determine, to construct, operate and maintain toll bridges in Monroe County, Florida, and to connect said toll bridges with the public roads within said county," etc., contains the following:

"Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

"Section 1. The powers and authority are hereby conferred upon the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, to grant licenses, privileges or franchises to any person, firm or corporation, to construct or operate toll bridges across the waters and streams of Monroe County, Florida, provided, however, before any such bridges are constructed, the permission of the War Department of the United States must first be obtained for the construction and maintenance of said bridges.

"Sec. 2. The Board of County Commissioners shall determine the period of time for which the licenses, privileges and franchises shall exist, provided no such licenses, privileges or franchises shall extend beyond the period of forty years from the date said bridges are placed in operation. *Page 366

"Sec. 3. The Board of County Commissioners shall have power to determine the conditions under which said franchises, licenses or privileges are granted, and shall have power to require security, from persons receiving said franchises and shall determine the rules and regulations under which said toll bridges shall be operated in the State of Florida."

The franchise granted to the respondent states that:

" 'The County does hereby agree, subject to the approval and granting of permission by the United States War Department for the construction and maintenance of said Toll Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills to grant to the said George J. Rosenthal, his heirs, legal representatives and assigns, and, if approved by the said United States War Department, does hereby grant to the said George J. Rosenthal, his heirs, legal representatives and assigns, the sole and exclusive Franchise, License and Privilege to construct, operate and maintain Toll Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills over and across the waters of Monroe County and State of Florida, from No Name Key, Florida, to Lower Matecumbie, Florida, connecting up the two ends of the State Road 4-A and known as the Oversea Highway as provided in the said plans and routes as approved by the War Department of the United States of America.

" 'Said exclusive Grant, Franchise, License and Privilege shall be construed to mean that no other and/or further Grant, Franchise, License and/or Privilege will be granted to any person, firm or corporation, during the life of this Grant, Franchise, License and Privilege, to build, construct and operate any passenger Ferry, Bridges, Causeways, and/or Fills for the use of the general publis, within a radius of ten miles on either side of the termini of the Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills allowed to be constructed and operated *Page 367 within the purview of this Franchise. Nor will Monroe County itself, build, construct, maintain and/or operate any Bridge, Causeway, Fills and/or Ferries during the life of this Franchise on or over the waters of the State of Florida and connecting the Oversea Highway with the mainland or any part thereof from No Name Key, Florida, to Lower Matecumbie, Florida, or within the radius of ten miles from the Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills or termini thereof as provided in this Franchise. Provided, however, that Ferries may be operated until such time as the Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills provided for in this instrument shall have been opened to the public."

"And the said county of Monroe hereby permits and allows the said George J. Rosenthal, his heirs, legal representatives and assigns, to construct, build, operate and maintain all public utilities that the said George J. Rosenthal may desire over, under and upon the said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills, provided the said public utilities, or any of them, shall not interfere with or obstruct the normal flow of traffic over said bridges. And the said George J. Rosenthal, his heirs, executors, administrators or assigns, is hereby granted the right to construct, operate and maintain gradings, and equipment, dredges and dredging equipment over and under said bridges; to construct necessary piling and docks adjacent to said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills and to construct all things and do all things that by necessary implication would be absolutely essential, incidental and appertaining to the efficient construction, operation and maintenance of said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills.

"And the said Franchise is hereby issued on the following terms and conditions, to-wit: The said George J. Rosenthal shall furnish to the County a penal bond, on or before six months from date of this Franchise, in the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) conditioned that the *Page 368 said George J. Rosenthal shall begin actual physical construction of said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills within ninety days from the date of furnishing of said Bond and shall complete the said Bridges within thirty-six months from the date of the commencing of building operations, unless the same is rendered impossible of strict performance by an Act of God, changing elements, earthquake or the public enemy. Said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills to be constructed according to plans and specifications hereafter to be submitted by the said George J. Rosenthal and which are to be approved by the United States War Department.

"Provided further, that the said George J. Rosenthal shall agree to and will operate said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills as toll bridges for the use and benefit of the people of Monroe County, and other members of the traveling public and to maintain said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills in an efficient manner accommodating all the usual and common traffic of persons, their vehicles and property that may apply for passage over said Bridges, Causeways and/or Fills.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Bliss v. Blitch
130 So. 444 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Moses v. Autuono
56 Fla. 499 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Leonard v. Baylen Street Wharf Co.
59 Fla. 547 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Hall v. Hardaker
61 Fla. 267 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Price v. McLeod
64 So. 769 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)
Lainhart v. Catts
75 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)
State ex rel. Young v. Duval County
76 Fla. 180 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Wallis v. Inhabitants of Wenham
90 N.E. 396 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Seaboard Ins. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
47 So. 2d 353 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1950)
Hutchins v. Murphy
110 N.W. 52 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)
State ex rel. Attorney General v. Janesville Water Co.
66 N.W. 512 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 So. 769, 109 Fla. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-v-rosental-fla-1933.