State, Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Et Ux.

184 So. 926, 134 Fla. 689
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 926 (State, Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Et Ux., 184 So. 926, 134 Fla. 689 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, and the same having been duly considered by the Court, the Court is of the opinion that the final decree appealed from should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

*690 Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Ellis, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 So. 926, 134 Fla. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-v-lewis-et-ux-fla-1938.