State, Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

State, Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Et Ux.

184 So. 926, 134 Fla. 689

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 31, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, and the same having been duly considered by the Court, the Court is of the opinion that the final decree appealed from should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

*690 Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Ellis, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, and the same having been duly considered by the Court, the Court is of the opinion that the final decree appealed from should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

*690 Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Ellis, C. J., dissents.

State, Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Et Ux., 184 So. 926, 134 Fla. 689 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

184 So. 926 (State, Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Et Ux.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.