State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

32 N.E.2d 23, 137 Ohio St. 609

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1941

DocketNo. 27359

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.E.2d 23 (State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm., 32 N.E.2d 23, 137 Ohio St. 609 (Ohio 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

^* Reporter's Note: See 136 Ohio St. 221,24 N.E.2d 947, for per curiam opinion sustaining demurrer.State, ex rel. Earl J. Jones Coal Co., v.Industrial Commission, reported, supra, was settled and dismissed. This cause having previously come on to be heard upon the demurrer of the respondent, the Industrial *Page 610 Commission of Ohio, to the petition for writ of mandamus theretofore filed herein, and the court having found that said demurrer was well founded; and the court having accordingly sustained said demurrer to said petition in mandamus; and the relator not having pleaded over and not having indicated to the court any desire or intention so to plead over; it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the writ of mandamus prayed for in relator's petition be and is hereby denied, and the petition for writ of mandamus be and is hereby dismissed.

Writ denied and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

^* Reporter's Note: See 136 Ohio St. 221,24 N.E.2d 947, for per curiam opinion sustaining demurrer.State, ex rel. Earl J. Jones Coal Co., v.Industrial Commission, reported, supra, was settled and dismissed. This cause having previously come on to be heard upon the demurrer of the respondent, the Industrial *Page 610 Commission of Ohio, to the petition for writ of mandamus theretofore filed herein, and the court having found that said demurrer was well founded; and the court having accordingly sustained said demurrer to said petition in mandamus; and the relator not having pleaded over and not having indicated to the court any desire or intention so to plead over; it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the writ of mandamus prayed for in relator's petition be and is hereby denied, and the petition for writ of mandamus be and is hereby dismissed.

Writ denied and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.E.2d 23, 137 Ohio St. 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-v-indus-comm-ohio-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack