Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

20 N.E.2d 925, 135 Ohio St. 310
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Ohio St. 537 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1939·No. No. 27305·Published

Opinion

The only question involved in this proceeding is thus stated in the brief of counsel for relator: "The controversy is simply whether or not Section 1465-90, General Code, which became effective July 3, 1937, applies. If it does, then this writ, admittedly, should be granted. The argument of respondent against its applicability rests solely on the *Page 311 effect of Section 26, General Code, with respect thereto."

That question was answered by this court in State, ex rel.Longano, v. Industrial Commission, ante, 165, and a writ will, therefore, be denied.

Writ denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS, MYERS, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm., 20 N.E.2d 925, 135 Ohio St. 310 (Ohio 1939).

20 N.E.2d 925 (State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.