State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

156 N.E. 143, 115 Ohio St. 713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Ohio St. 271
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1926·No. No. 19749·Published

Opinion

This court finds that the demurrer to the petition should be overruled, for the reason that the petition states that a judgment was obtained in the court of common pleas of Ashland county, which judgment included interest thereon, and that said judgment is in full force and effect and unreversed. If error intervened in the judgment of the court of common pleas of Ashland county, it was incumbent upon the Industrial Commission to prosecute error therefrom, and that judgment is not subject to collateral attack.

Demurrer overruled.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur. *Page 714

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm., 156 N.E. 143, 115 Ohio St. 713 (Ohio 1926).

156 N.E. 143 (State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.