State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.

70 N.E.2d 268, 147 Ohio St. 179

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 27, 1946

DocketNo. 30719

StatusPublished

This text of 70 N.E.2d 268 (State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm., 70 N.E.2d 268, 147 Ohio St. 179 (Ohio 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

^* Reporter's Note: For another proceeding between the same parties, see 143 Ohio St. 475, 55 N.E.2d 800. Counsel resisting the motion to dismiss this appeal contends that the case at bar originated in the Court of Appeals and therefore the motion is not well taken since this court has "appellate jurisdiction * * * in cases which originated in the Courts of Appeals * * *."

The petition in mandamus was filed in the Court of Appeals and the issues in the original proceeding were adjudicated by this court when the judgment of that court was affirmed. The relator is not entitled to a second appeal as of right to this court from the same judgment in a case which originated in the Court of Appeals.

Counsel contends further that "this is an action which was originally filed in the Court of Appeals * * * in the form of a motion * * *."

No "case" originated in the Court of Appeals by the mere filing of such a motion.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, BELL, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

TURNER, J., not participating. *Page 181

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI