State, Ex Rel. v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Florida

State, Ex Rel. v. Hollingsworth

156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 27, 1934·Published

Opinion

Motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus is overruled on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State,ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 So. 372, and State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607,146 So. 660.

The Respondents are allowed fifteen days from the date of filing of this Order in which to file return or answer. Respondents failing to file return or answer as herein directed, peremptory writ shall issue.

It is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

*Page 852

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus is overruled on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State,ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 So. 372, and State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607,146 So. 660.

The Respondents are allowed fifteen days from the date of filing of this Order in which to file return or answer. Respondents failing to file return or answer as herein directed, peremptory writ shall issue.

It is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

*Page 852

State, Ex Rel. v. Hollingsworth, 156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

156 So. 286 (State, Ex Rel. v. Hollingsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related