State, Ex Rel. v. Hollingsworth

156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 286 (State, Ex Rel. v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, Ex Rel. v. Hollingsworth, 156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus is overruled on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of State,ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 103 Fla. 801, 138 So. 372, and State, ex rel. Tullidge, v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607,146 So. 660.

The Respondents are allowed fifteen days from the date of filing of this Order in which to file return or answer. Respondents failing to file return or answer as herein directed, peremptory writ shall issue.

It is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

*Page 852

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Tullidge v. Hollingsworth
138 So. 372 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
State Ex Rel. Tullidge v. Hollingsworth
146 So. 660 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 286, 115 Fla. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-v-hollingsworth-fla-1934.