State, Ex Rel. v. Court of Crimes, Dade County

157 So. 17, 117 Fla. 26
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*27 Per Curiam.

Where it is claimed that a bond given under Sections 8426-8427 C. G. L., 6121-6122 R. G. S., is unenforceable and will not authorize the issuance of an execution for the amount of the fine or costs of both, as specified in the bond, as' against the sureties thereon, the appropriate procedure is that prescribed by Section 4515 C. G. L., 2828 R. G. S., or by C. G. L., 2829 R. G. S., ánd not by prohibition, as was pursued in this case.

Constitutional writ in aid of writ of error taken to judgment dismissing prohibition proceeding in Circuit Court denied.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Ex Rel. v. Court of Crimes, Dade County, 157 So. 17, 117 Fla. 26 (Fla. 1934).

157 So. 17 (State, Ex Rel. v. Court of Crimes, Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Flournoy
136 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
State v. Maxie
66 So. 2d 670 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)