State Ex Rel. v. Cone, Governor

191 So. 50, 140 Fla. 1

• Court: Supreme Court of Florida
• Decided: August 1, 1939
• Status: Published

Opinion

Whitfield, J. —

On the relation of a resident citizen taxpayer of the State, an alternative writ of mandamus issued from this Court, in effect, alleges that the Board of Administration has a surplus of gas tax funds to the credit of stated counties, over and above current interest and sinking fund requirements to pay the road bonds of such counties, and as prayed by relator under Chapter 19279, Acts of 1939, commands the members of the boar'd to pay over to the State Road Department 80% of the surplus in any county account, except sinking fund account, after such application as is provided by law, or to show cause. Respondents moved to quash the writ.

Without discussing the question of a proper relator, since the relator is a resident citizen taxpayer of the State and the matter presented is of public concern and immediate importance, the merits of the cause on motion to quash will be considered.

The controversy is as to the legal effect of an amendment to Section 14 of Chapter 14486, Acts of 1929, as amended by Chapter 15891, Acts of 1933, which amended section is as follows:

“Section 14. (a) The Board of Administration shall, annually before the 1st day of June of each year, carefully estimate the amount of money which will be available for the next fiscal year, for each of the accounts provided for by Section 13 of this Act.'

“(b) In arriving at the amount of money available to meet the requirements of interest and principal or sinking funds of the bonds to which such accounts are applicable, respectively, the Board of Administration shall first apply any available funds in the Sinking Fund Accounts, so far as may be necessary. If the moneys so applied are not sufficient for said purpose in any county, it shall then apply to meet such requirements, so far as may be necessary, any money to the credit or estimated to be available for the credit of such county from the gas tax or other moneys made available by law as a supplementary source of revenue.

“(c) In so applying moneys credited to each county, except sinking fund accounts, there shall be apportioned to each subdivision (whether the county itself or road and bridge districts therein) such proportion of the moneys as the amount of the participating bonds of each subdivision bears to the aggregate amount of the participating bonds to which the accounts are applicable.

“(d) Provided, the State Board of Administration is hereby authorized and directed, by and with the approval of the county commissioners of the affected county, to be evidenced by a resolution thereof duly certified to and filed with said State Board of Administration, to use any or all of the moneys derived from gasoline taxes and credited to the account of such county, or road, or road and bridge district therein, for the purpose of purchasing at a price below the par value thereof, and at the lowest bid offered, any bond or bonds of any road district, roád and bridge district, or county, district bond issue to which such moneys as credited to--such county, would be applicable, the purpose and intention of this proviso being to direct and to require that all moneys derived from the additional sources of revenue provided by this Act, as amended, shall, if deemed advisable, be used for the best interests of the road districts, road and bridge, districts, special road and bridge districts, and counties of the State by the purchase and acquisition of all outstanding bonds thereof which may be acquired at greatly depreciated prices below, the par value thereof, whether such bonds be matured or unmatured or be in default or not for principal or interest. The State Board of Administration shall give due notice of its purpose to purchase any of: such bonds by publication of such notice, at least one of which notices be published in a newspaper regularly pubT lished in the county where such bonds were issued. Such, notice shall call for sealed bids and shall state the time and place at which said bids shall be opened. Said Board of Administration shall have the right to reject or accept any and all bids or portions of bids. And the said Board of-Administration shall have the right to prescribe the security for the performance by the bidder.

“(e) All bonds purchased and acquired by the said Board of Administration under Paragraph (d) of this Section-as amended, shall not be cancelled but shall be held in trust by the State Board of Administration to be retired by said State Board of Administration only when specially-determined by said State Board of Administration to be for the best interest of the State of Florida and the several counties' and -districts thereof contemplated by this Act.

“(f) The Board-of Administration shall-keep a full, complete and'accurate record of all purchases of bonds made under this-section as amended, of-the-price paid for same and from or through whom purchased. All securities purchased shall remain in the hands of the State Treasurer to be held by him as other funds and securities coming into his custody are held as provided by law.

“(g) Resolutions adopted by county commissioners of the several counties under Paragraph (d) for the purpose of approving the purchase of bonds by the State Board of Administration as by said paragraph authorized, may contain such restrictions, conditions, and limitations as to price to be paid, and class, series or issue to be purchased, as the county commissioners may see fit to approve, and may be given for such period of time as in the judgment of the county commissioners is deemed for the best interest of the county. Resolutions so adopted may be rescinded by the county commissioners, or thereafter amended or modified with like effect and authority as is given for the original adoption of such resolutions.

“Provided that any surplus in any county accounts, 'except sinking fund accounts, after such application as is provided .herein, shall be remitted to the county for the use of which such account was' created and shall be used by such county only in the construction and/or maintenance of roads therein.”

The amendment to Section 14 by Chapter 19279., Acts of 1939, enacts as a substitute for the last paragraph of Section 14 above quoted the following: ■ . .

“Eighty per cent (80^) of 'any surplus in any county account, except sinking fund account, after such application as is provided herein shall be remitted to the State Road Department to be used by the said State Road Department in the counties which are entitled to such credit in the construction of any State road before that time designated in ;such counties, regardless of the preferential system, and/or in the purchase or lease of any toll bridge now or hereafter situated in said counties, or any bridge constructed or to be hereafter constructed by such county or'any State agency therein, and which forms a link in any road now or hereafter designated a State road.

“Twenty per cent (20%) of any such surplus in any county account, except sinking fund account, after such application, shall be remitted to the county for use of which such county account was created, and shall be used by such county only for the construction and maintenance of roads therein.

“No second gas tax funds, placed to the credit of the ■several counties, which funds are administered by the State Board of Administration, shall be used for any other purpose than as expressly provided in this Section 14, any law or laws of the State of Florida to the contrary notwithstanding.”

Relator, in effect, contends that the statute is within the authority of the Legislature to enact and that it is operative in full effect upon gas tax funds in the hands of the board for credit to the counties from the date of the enactment when the Act by its terms became effective.

Respondents in effect insist that the amending statute is not intended to so operate retrospectively as to apply to ■funds then in hand for credit to counties for road construction purposes, but applies to future collections from the effective date of the amending statute, which is June 9, 1939.

The funds are derived from State excise taxes on sales of gasoline to be used for public road purposes; and the allocations and appropriations of what is called the second gas tax is, primarily, to pay the counties and districts for roads constructed by them and taken over by the State for State purposes prior to July 1, 1931, and then to other road purposes in the counties. Since 1931 many roads built by counties and districts have been taken over by the State; but no general statutory provision is made to pay for such roads, though the counties and districts greatly need the gas tax proration to pay debts incurred in constructing roads taken over by the State.

Section 7 of Chapter 15659, Acts of 1931, is as follows:

“Section 7. It is hereby expressly recognized and declared by the Legislature of the State of Florida that all roads being constructed or built or which have heretofore been constructed or built, or which will be hereafter constructed or built by. the State Road Department under prior authorization and/or designation by the Legislature of the State of Florida as State Roads, or which were constructed or built by any county or special road and bridge district or other special taxing districts thereof, were, are and will be constructed and built as State projects and undertakings, and that the cost of the construction and building thereof was, is and will be a legitimate proper State expense incurred for a general and State purpose and should be wholly borne by the State of Florida. It is hereby expressly recognized that certain of the counties of the State of Florida and/or special road and bridge districts or other taxing districts of such counties have advanced or contributed and paid to the State Road Department varying sums of money to be used and expended by said State Road Department in the construction and building of State roads theretofore authorized and/or designated by the Legislature of the State of Florida as State projects, and it is hereby expressly recognized that certain of the counties of the State of Florida arid/or special road and bridge districts or other taxing districts of such counties have paid or expended or caused to have been paid or expended varying sums of money in the construction and building of certain roads that are now State .roads and heretofore designated as State roads by the Legislature of the State of Florida and that all such moneys .have been and are being expended, furnished, advanced, contributed or paid out on account of expenses of the State in construction and building of said State roads to and .for the general benefit of the State and that such sums should be returned and repaid respectively to each county to the amount that such county and/or any special road and bridge district or special taxing districts thereof have advanced or expended in the construction of the same.”

When transportation by motor vehicles became a practical success, good roads were essential; and as the State could not issue bonds for public road construction, and current ad valorem taxation was inadequate to supply suitable roads for heavy, rapid moving motor vehicles, resort was had to county and district bonds and taxation for good roads. This burden soon proved to be far too great for the counties and districts. Beginning in 1923 excise taxes on sales of gasoline were levied by the State for road purposes.

In 1929 and 1931 and 1933 and subsequent years statutes ■were inacted and State excise gas taxes were collected for State road construction and maintenance and for allocation and appropriation to the counties ha pay for roads taken over by the State prior to July 1, 1931.

The essential question is not the validity of Chapter 19279, Acts of 1939, but the interpretation of the statute to accomplish the law-making intent in a regulation affecting the statutory regulations of excise taxes levied by the Legislature for public road purposes throughout the State.'

While the Legislature has plenary power over the public •roads in the state, and- may regulate, their construction and maintenance by State officials or by county officials and at State expense or at county or district expense in the county or district, yet the Legislature, having taken over for State .purposes many roads constructed by counties and districts, has by statute declared a purpose to compensate the counties and districts for the roads so taken over by the State, statutes giving relief to the counties should be interpreted to accord with such legislative purpose to do justice to the counties and districts, which have severally assumed large indebtedness for State road construction; and changes in statutory regulations should not be so interpreted as to deny the counties and districts full benefits of existing statutory regulations affording relief to counties and districts, when amendatory statutes do not clearly show an intent to make them retroactive to the detriment of counties which have large indebtedness for public road construction. The portion of Section 14 above quoted, before the amendment of 1939, authorized the counties to use surplus funds, if any, in constructing roads in the counties, and the counties were .justified in making contracts or other arrangements to use for county road purposes any surplus accruing in the funds for current road purposes until the law is changed.

. The law presumes that a regulatory statute is intended to operate prospectively unless a contrary intent clearly appears from a consideration of the terms and purpose of the enactment. There being nothing in the provisions of Chapter 19279 indicating an intent or purpose to retrospectively regulate the disposition of any surplus that may remain in allocations of gas tax funds to counties after satisfying all previous enactments on the subject, it will not be assumed that the Legislature intended that the Act should so operate as to interrupt or interfere with any authorized. uses of such, surplus funds, if any, that resulted from payments of the gas tax before the effective date of the statute.

This interpretation is the correct one even if the rigid requirements of the budget laws would not be impaired by a retrospective operation of Chapter 19279. A further discussion is perhaps unnecessary.

The motion to quash the alternative writ is granted.

Terrell, C. J., and Brown, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Justice Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.