State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.

150 N.E. 756, 113 Ohio St. 717
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 Ohio St. 602
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 1925·No. No. 19375·Published

Opinion

No answer having been made by the defendants, but it appearing that since the filing of this action said defendants have paid to said Retirement Board the sum of $885.00, leaving a balance of $503.50 due from said defendants to said Retirement Board, the court find that as to said balance of $503.50 the relator is entitled to have said writ made peremptory.

It is therefore ordered that peremptory writ of mandamus issue against the said defendants for the performance of the act heretofore alternatively ordered, and that immediately upon the service of this writ said defendants be required to pay over and transmit to said Retirement Board said sum of $503.50.

Writ allowed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN and KINKADE, JJ., concur.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn., 150 N.E. 756, 113 Ohio St. 717 (Ohio 1925).

150 N.E. 756 (State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.