State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Thrifty Call, Inc.
579 S.E.2d 575, 357 N.C. 66
Opinion
1. Respondent’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COAOl-1466)
2. Respondent’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Respondent’s Alternative PDR of Constitutional Issues
4. Respondent’s Motion to Avoid Inconsistency With Federal Tribunal by Holding Proceeding in Abeyance, Referring Matter to FCC, and/or Requesting FCC to Submit Amicus Cumae Brief
5. Respondent’s Motion for Leave to File Reply to Response to PDR
1. Dismissed ex mero motu
2. Denied
3. Denied
4. Denied
5. Dismissed as Moot
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Thrifty Call, Inc., 579 S.E.2d 575, 357 N.C. 66 (N.C. 2003).
579 S.E.2d 575 (State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Thrifty Call, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bass v. Pinnacle Custom Homes, Inc.
592 S.E.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)