State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.

332 S.E.2d 491, 313 N.C. 751
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 16, 1985·No. No. 227A83·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

NANTAHALA Power and Light Company’s (hereinafter “Nantahala”) Motion for Writ of Supersedeas filed herein on 17 July 1985 is Denied.

The orders of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, affirmed by this Court on 3 July 1985, requiring Nantahala to make refund payments to its customers are temporarily stayed to and including the 31st day of July 1985 but no longer. The temporary stay allowed by this order will expire automatically at 12:01 a.m. on 1 August 1985 without the necessity of any further order by this Court. The purpose of the stay is to permit Nantahala to seek a writ of certiorari and stay from the United States Supreme Court.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 18th day of July 1985.

Mitchell, J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co., 332 S.E.2d 491, 313 N.C. 751 (N.C. 1985).

332 S.E.2d 491 (State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byers v. North Carolina Savings Institutions Division
474 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Batten v. N.C. Department of Correction
389 S.E.2d 35 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1990)
Hargett v. Reed
382 S.E.2d 791 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Richmond County
369 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
North Carolina Department of Justice v. Eaker
367 S.E.2d 392 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
335 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)