Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten

227 S.E.2d 602, 30 N.C. App. 475, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 N.C. App. 662 →
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided August 18, 1976·No. No. 7610UC230·Published

Opinions

HEDRICK, Judge.

While the dates of certain previous orders are different, and the rates per KWH and total amounts of money involved are not the same, the questions of law presented by this appeal are substantially the same as those presented in State of North Carolina ex rel. Utilities Commission and Duke Power Company, Applicant v. Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, No. 7610UC209, opinion filed this day. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the orders appealed from in this cause are

Affirmed.

Judge Britt concurs. Judge Martin dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten, 227 S.E.2d 602, 30 N.C. App. 475, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2288 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

227 S.E.2d 602 (State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.