State ex rel. Upper Arlington v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections
893 N.E.2d 847, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1456
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of the motion of Michael A. Schadek for [1457] leave to intervene as a respondent,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Upper Arlington v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections, 893 N.E.2d 847, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Ohio 2008).
893 N.E.2d 847 (State ex rel. Upper Arlington v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.