State ex rel. Upper Arlington v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections
893 N.E.2d 847, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1456
This text of 893 N.E.2d 847 (State ex rel. Upper Arlington v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Upper Arlington v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections, 893 N.E.2d 847, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Ohio 2008).
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of the motion of Michael A. Schadek for [1457]*1457leave to intervene as a respondent,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
893 N.E.2d 847, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-upper-arlington-v-franklin-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2008.