State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 160, 83 Ohio St. 3d 144

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 1998

Docket1996-2304

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 160 (State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 160, 83 Ohio St. 3d 144 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 144.]

THE STATE EX REL. UNITED SCREW & BOLT CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE; GATSON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-160.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed. (No. 96-2304—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEALS and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD08-1024. __________________ Calfee, Halter & Griswold L.L.P. and William L.S. Ross, for appellee and cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and David J. Kovach, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee. Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy; Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent and would affirm the court of appeals. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 144.]

THE STATE EX REL. UNITED SCREW & BOLT CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE; GATSON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-160.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed. (No. 96-2304—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEALS and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD08-1024. __________________ Calfee, Halter & Griswold L.L.P. and William L.S. Ross, for appellee and cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and David J. Kovach, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee. Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy; Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent and would affirm the court of appeals. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 160, 83 Ohio St. 3d 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-united-screw-bolt-corp-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack