State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio

2013 Ohio 5188, 3 N.E.3d 1183, 138 Ohio St. 3d 83

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 3, 2013

Docket2013-1268

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2013 Ohio 5188 (State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio, 2013 Ohio 5188, 3 N.E.3d 1183, 138 Ohio St. 3d 83 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2013 Ohio 5188, 3 N.E.3d 1183, 138 Ohio St. 3d 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ullmann-v-jobsohio-ohio-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack