State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio

2013 Ohio 5188, 3 N.E.3d 1183, 138 Ohio St. 3d 83

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 2013·No. 2013-1268·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio, 2013 Ohio 5188, 3 N.E.3d 1183, 138 Ohio St. 3d 83 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

2013 Ohio 5188 (State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related