State ex rel. Tworoger v. Gary Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State ex rel. Tworoger v. Gary Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc.

467 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13399

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1985

DocketNos. 84-1814, 84-2157

StatusPublished

This text of 467 So. 2d 433 (State ex rel. Tworoger v. Gary Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Tworoger v. Gary Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc., 467 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated non-final appeals arising from proceedings in which appellants have sought temporary injunctive relief against appellees for alleged noise and visual nuisances. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We reverse the trial court’s order enjoining appellants or their agents from communicating with the City of Fort Lauderdale during the pendency of these proceedings. We believe this injunction is overly broad and not supported by record evidence. We leave intact the remainder of the orders entered by the trial court without prejudice to either party to raise these issues anew both in the trial court and on appeal from any final orders entered in the cause.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated non-final appeals arising from proceedings in which appellants have sought temporary injunctive relief against appellees for alleged noise and visual nuisances. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We reverse the trial court’s order enjoining appellants or their agents from communicating with the City of Fort Lauderdale during the pendency of these proceedings. We believe this injunction is overly broad and not supported by record evidence. We leave intact the remainder of the orders entered by the trial court without prejudice to either party to raise these issues anew both in the trial court and on appeal from any final orders entered in the cause.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tworoger-v-gary-fronrath-chevrolet-inc-fladistctapp-1985.