State ex rel. Twigg v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 2000 Ohio 457 (State ex rel. Twigg v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 449.]
THE STATE EX REL. TWIGG, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Twigg v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-457.] Workers’ compensation–Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-681—Submitted November 16, 1999—Decided January 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-566. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant and cross- appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Plymale, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee and cross-appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 457, 87 Ohio St. 3d 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-twigg-v-indus-comm-ohio-2000.