State ex rel. Tussing v. Industrial Commission

112 Ohio St. 3d 544
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 14, 2007
DocketNo. 2006-0651
StatusPublished

This text of 112 Ohio St. 3d 544 (State ex rel. Tussing v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Tussing v. Industrial Commission, 112 Ohio St. 3d 544 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, grant the writ, and return the cause to the Industrial Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 Ohio St. 3d 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tussing-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2007.