State ex rel. Tucker v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Tucker v. State

778 So. 2d 595, 2001 La. LEXIS 64, 2001 WL 23217

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 5, 2001

DocketNo. 2000-KH-1257

StatusPublished

This text of 778 So. 2d 595 (State ex rel. Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Tucker v. State, 778 So. 2d 595, 2001 La. LEXIS 64, 2001 WL 23217 (La. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Tucker, Jerry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. V, No. 4-90-16; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 99 KW 2490.

Denied. See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), 684 So.2d 349; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).

JOHNSON, J.,

Relator did not move to quash the indictment, and waived the discrimination claim. Francis v. Henderson, 425 U.S. 536, 96 S.Ct. 1708, 48 L.Ed.2d 149.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Tucker, Jerry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. V, No. 4-90-16; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 99 KW 2490.

Denied. See, e.g., Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), 684 So.2d 349; see also Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 352-55 (6th Cir.1998).

JOHNSON, J.,

Relator did not move to quash the indictment, and waived the discrimination claim. Francis v. Henderson, 425 U.S. 536, 96 S.Ct. 1708, 48 L.Ed.2d 149.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

778 So. 2d 595, 2001 La. LEXIS 64, 2001 WL 23217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tucker-v-state-la-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack