State ex rel. Truitt v. Lombard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Truitt v. Lombard

547 So. 2d 372, 1989 La. LEXIS 1847, 1989 WL 89711

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 10, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-1885

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 372 (State ex rel. Truitt v. Lombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Truitt v. Lombard, 547 So. 2d 372, 1989 La. LEXIS 1847, 1989 WL 89711 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Truitt, Alan P.; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory [373]*373and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 281-028.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of sentencing transcript he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Truitt, Alan P.; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory [373]*373and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 281-028.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of sentencing transcript he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 372, 1989 La. LEXIS 1847, 1989 WL 89711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-truitt-v-lombard-la-1989.