State ex rel. Traverse v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Traverse v. City of New Orleans

97 So. 446, 154 La. 289, 1923 La. LEXIS 1926

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 11, 1923

DocketNo. 24706

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 So. 446 (State ex rel. Traverse v. City of New Orleans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Traverse v. City of New Orleans, 97 So. 446, 154 La. 289, 1923 La. LEXIS 1926 (La. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is one of the cases referred to in our opinion handed down to-day in State ex rel. Civello v. City of New Orleans (No. 25566) 97 South. 440.¹ It is a mandamus proceeding to compel the municipal authorities to issue to relator a permit to establish a drive-in filling station, for the accommodation of automobiles, on his lot on Esplanade avenue and Broad street. The establishment of the business on Esplanade' avenue, anywhere between Decatur street and Bayou St. John, is forbidden by Ordinance No. 5706, C. C. S. Eor that reason, the civil district court rejected relator’s demand. He has appealed. The issues are the same that were decided to-day in Civello’s Case. Eor the reasons given in that case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, at appellant’s cost.

ROGERS, J., takes no part

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is one of the cases referred to in our opinion handed down to-day in State ex rel. Civello v. City of New Orleans (No. 25566) 97 South. 440.¹ It is a mandamus proceeding to compel the municipal authorities to issue to relator a permit to establish a drive-in filling station, for the accommodation of automobiles, on his lot on Esplanade avenue and Broad street. The establishment of the business on Esplanade' avenue, anywhere between Decatur street and Bayou St. John, is forbidden by Ordinance No. 5706, C. C. S. Eor that reason, the civil district court rejected relator’s demand. He has appealed. The issues are the same that were decided to-day in Civello’s Case. Eor the reasons given in that case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, at appellant’s cost.

ROGERS, J., takes no part

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 446, 154 La. 289, 1923 La. LEXIS 1926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-traverse-v-city-of-new-orleans-la-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack