State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin
580 N.E.2d 782, 62 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792
Opinion
On appeal, appellant argues that his conviction was obtained through fraud and trickery of the state and his court-appointed counsel. These allegations do not attack the jurisdiction of the sentencing court and are not grounds for issuing a writ of habeas corpus. See R.C. 2725.05 and State, ex rel. Justice, v. McMackin (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 72, 558 N.E.2d 1183.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin, 580 N.E.2d 782, 62 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792 (Ohio 1991).
580 N.E.2d 782 (State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keith v. Bobby, 2007-P-0027 (9-28-2007)
2007 Ohio 5210 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Howard v. Randle
2002 Ohio 2122 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Wade v. Director, Unpublished Decision (10-15-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999
State ex rel. Tran v. McGrath
1997 Ohio 245 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)