State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin

580 N.E.2d 782, 62 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1991·No. No. 90-2043·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that his conviction was obtained through fraud and trickery of the state and his court-appointed counsel. These allegations do not attack the jurisdiction of the sentencing court and are not grounds for issuing a writ of habeas corpus. See R.C. 2725.05 and State, ex rel. Justice, v. McMackin (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 72, 558 N.E.2d 1183.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin, 580 N.E.2d 782, 62 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792 (Ohio 1991).

580 N.E.2d 782 (State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keith v. Bobby, 2007-P-0027 (9-28-2007)
2007 Ohio 5210 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Howard v. Randle
2002 Ohio 2122 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
State ex rel. Tran v. McGrath
1997 Ohio 245 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)