State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin

580 N.E.2d 782, 62 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 4, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2043

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 580 N.E.2d 782 (State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin, 580 N.E.2d 782, 62 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792 (Ohio 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that his conviction was obtained through fraud and trickery of the state and his court-appointed counsel. These allegations do not attack the jurisdiction of the sentencing court and are not grounds for issuing a writ of habeas corpus. See R.C. 2725.05 and State, ex rel. Justice, v. McMackin (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 72, 558 N.E.2d 1183.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI