State ex rel. Trafalgar Corp. v. Miami Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Trafalgar Corp. v. Miami Cty. Bd. of Elections

853 N.E.2d 670, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1475

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 1, 2006·No. 2006-1564·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election matter. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed a merit brief, due August 27, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election matter. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed a merit brief, due August 27, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

State ex rel. Trafalgar Corp. v. Miami Cty. Bd. of Elections, 853 N.E.2d 670, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1475 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

853 N.E.2d 670 (State ex rel. Trafalgar Corp. v. Miami Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.