State ex rel. Tracy v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

609 N.E.2d 561, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1215, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 816
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Tracy v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 Ohio St. 3d 644
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1993·No. No. 93-459·Published

Opinions

In Prohibition.

On Motion for Peremptory Writ.

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for peremptory writ of prohibition in the first instance, or alternatively, an alternative writ and stay of preliminary injunction,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for an alternative writ be, and the same is hereby, granted, and respondents are to show cause on or before March 29, 1993, why the writ of prohibition should not be issued.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the operation of the preliminary injunction issued by respondents against assessment and collection of the Ohio Beverage Tax, R.C. Chapter 5753, in the case styled Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Co. et al. v. Roger W. Tracy, Tax Commissioner, et al., case No. 93CVH-02-729, filed February 1, 1993, in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio, be stayed, pending final hearing and determination of the complaint in prohibition.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Tracy v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, 609 N.E.2d 561, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1215, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 816 (Ohio 1993).

609 N.E.2d 561 (State ex rel. Tracy v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.